@liquid_launcher
Account claims to be 'official account of liquid protocol' with a contract address in bio, but the linked website (liquidprotocol.org) is flagged by X as potentially malicious/spammy/unsafe according to X's URL Policy. The account was created in April 2026 (future date suggests data error) with only 878 followers and provides no legitimate project information. No tweets available for verification.
Token
Where to trade
Links go to third-party venues. Always verify the contract address. Not financial advice.
Contract & market health
- ❌Contract can no longer mint tokens?MINT function present — dilution possible
- ✅Nobody can freeze, blacklist or pause?no pause, blacklist or cooldown
- ✅Sellable, without abusive tax?taxes 0/0%, verified source
- ❓Liquidity out of the team's reach?GoPlus only sees $58297 of LP against a $912457 pool (Uniswap v4?) — check manually
- ❌Top 10 wallets (excl. pool/staking/locker) ≤ 30%?88.6% (goplus)
- ❌No single wallet (excl. pool) above 10%?largest: 69.5% (contract unverified 0x498581…)
- ✅≥ 500 holders, growing over 7d?2687 holders (7d growth: not tracked yet)
- ❓Team / insider allocation vested on-chain?no locker/vesting identified — manual check (docs, transparency page)
- ✅Pool ≥ $50k?liquidity $912k
- ❌24h volume / liquidity between 0.2 and 5?vol $927 / liq = 0.0 (dormant token) · 7 buys / 25 sells
- ✅No overhang (mcap ≥ 30% of FDV, FDV ≤ $10M)?FDV $1.23M, mcap $1.23M (100%)
- ✅Healthy timing (pool ≥ 7d, no +300% pump, no wipeout)?pool 173d, +0%/24h, -1%/6h, 59% of known high
- ❓X account alive (≥ 3 months) and shipping (≥ 3 tweets/7d)?account 161d old · activity unknown
- ❌Real product and ≥ 2 scouts agree?0 AI green flag · 1 scout
Sources: GoPlus (contract), the chain explorer (holders), DexScreener (market), ohmybird (signal). ❓ means we couldn't verify it automatically — check it yourself. Not financial advice.
AI Analysisscam
Account claims to be 'official account of liquid protocol' with a contract address in bio, but the linked website (liquidprotocol.org) is flagged by X as potentially malicious/spammy/unsafe according to X's URL Policy.
The account was created in April 2026 (future date suggests data error) with only 878 followers and provides no legitimate project information.
No tweets available for verification.
Red flags: Website flagged by X as potentially unsafe/malicious/spammy · No accessible tweets to verify legitimacy · Contract address in bio with no verifiable project details · Extremely low follower count (878) for claimed 'official' protocol account · Zero substantive information about product, team, or technology
Recent tweetsSee all on 𝕏 →
No recent originals to show — see the account on 𝕏.
Signal Timeline
Score breakdown0–100
Watching for additional signals.