@NewLittleRabbit
Little Rabbit ($LRST) is a BSC-based token promoting a 'Staking as a Service' concept for developers. The project has minimal social presence (413 followers), generic branding, and lacks transparency around team, technical implementation, or working product beyond a swap interface. The whitepaper exists but no substantive technical differentiation is evident from available data.
Token
Where to trade
Links go to third-party venues. Always verify the contract address. Not financial advice.
Contract & market health
- ✅Contract can no longer mint tokens?no mint, no privileged owner
- ❌Nobody can freeze, blacklist or pause?whitelist
- ✅Sellable, without abusive tax?taxes 0/0%, verified source
- ✅Liquidity out of the team's reach?97% of LP burned/locked
- ◐Top 10 wallets (excl. pool/staking/locker) ≤ 30%?35.8% (goplus)
- ◐No single wallet (excl. pool) above 10%?largest: 13.2% (contract unverified 0x53b556…)
- ✅≥ 500 holders, growing over 7d?1520 holders (7d growth: not tracked yet)
- ❓Team / insider allocation vested on-chain?no locker/vesting identified — manual check (docs, transparency page)
- ◐Pool ≥ $50k?liquidity $27k
- ❌24h volume / liquidity between 0.2 and 5?vol $88 / liq = 0.0 (dormant token) · 0 buys / 2 sells
- ✅No overhang (mcap ≥ 30% of FDV, FDV ≤ $10M)?FDV $207k, mcap $207k (100%)
- ✅Healthy timing (pool ≥ 7d, no +300% pump, no wipeout)?pool 295d, -1%/24h, -1%/6h, 58% of known high
- ❓X account alive (≥ 3 months) and shipping (≥ 3 tweets/7d)?account 344d old · activity unknown
- ◐Real product and ≥ 2 scouts agree?3 AI green flags · 1 scout
Sources: GoPlus (contract), the chain explorer (holders), DexScreener (market), ohmybird (signal). ❓ means we couldn't verify it automatically — check it yourself. Not financial advice.
AI Analysisrisky
Little Rabbit ($LRST) is a BSC-based token promoting a 'Staking as a Service' concept for developers.
The project has minimal social presence (413 followers), generic branding, and lacks transparency around team, technical implementation, or working product beyond a swap interface.
The whitepaper exists but no substantive technical differentiation is evident from available data.
Green flags: Has deployed contract on BSC mainnet · Provides whitepaper documentation · Early-stage with small following (<500)
Red flags: No team information or identifiable founders · Generic 'rabbit' meme branding with vague technical claims · No evidence of working SaaS platform or developer adoption · Very recent account (created late 2025) with minimal engagement · Website lacks technical depth or proof of concept beyond token swap
Recent tweetsSee all on 𝕏 →
No recent originals to show — see the account on 𝕏.
Signal Timeline
Score breakdown0–100
Watching for additional signals.