@AimHigher_gg

108 participants entered AimHigher's first ever campaign. 5 got paid. We knew from day one that this would be the most important number. Not the price move. Not the rewards distributed. The fact that 103 people joined, connected their wallets, and earned nothing — because they didn't drive real capital. On InfoFi platforms, those 103 people would have earned something for clicking, retweeting, completing a form. The bot farms would have earned the most. On AimHigher — from campaign one, run one — the 5 people who actually moved bags got paid. The other 103 got a reminder that promotion without conversion is noise. We didn't adjust the algorithm after seeing these results. We celebrated them. This is exactly what performance-based marketing is supposed to look like. @AimHigher_gg | @lolepeplol

The winner of AimHigher's first ever campaign was @TheButcJ — and they won it the right way. Most top earners win on one dimension — usually ICS (personal investment). Buy in hard, score high, take the rewards. @TheButcJ did something different. TQS: 3.7 — small but present. They drove some external traffic. ICS: 764.5 — significant personal investment in $EPEP. RCS: 1,252.2 — the highest referred capital score on the entire leaderboard. Total: 2,020.38. 50% share. $429.82 earned. They didn't just believe in the project and buy in. They built a squad that converted. Multiple wallets from their network opened and bought $EPEP because of them. The first winner of an AimHigher campaign showed everyone exactly how to play it. Personal conviction backed by a network that acts on your recommendation. That's still the playbook today. https://t.co/8Nd4FYwA9C

The final leaderboard from AimHigher's first ever campaign: 🥇 @TheButcJ — $429.82 (50%) TQS: 3.7 · ICS: 764.5 · RCS: 1,252.2 — the complete package 🥈 @p1145498Danilo — $171.93 (20%) ICS: 934.2 — highest personal investment of any non-winner 🥉 @Fred_On_Chain — $85.96 (10%) ICS: 657.0 @av0cad069 — $85.96 (10%) @ForeverTrenches — $85.96 (10%) $859.63 distributed in total. 103 of 108 participants scored zero. Campaign one. The algorithm worked perfectly on its first run.

Every platform has a first campaign. This was ours. $EPEP ran the inaugural AimHigher pool on @AimHigher_gg — and it set the standard for everything that followed. 108 participants, $859.63 distributed to proven value drivers, and a price move that proved the model worked from day one. Full breakdown over the next week! 🧵

Here's the thing about AimHigher that most people miss. Your first campaign is the hardest. Your third campaign is where things get interesting. Here's why. Campaign 1: You're starting from zero. Maybe 5 squad members. You're learning the algorithm, figuring out which communities convert, testing your promotional angles. You earn something. More importantly, you earn a squad. Campaign 2: Those 5 squad members are still in your network. Some of them refer their own contacts. You've learned which groups convert and which don't. You know your pitch. Squad grows to ~15. Earnings roughly double. Campaign 3: Your squad is now 30–40 wallets deep. They've seen you deliver value twice. They trust your pool recommendations. You've become a known earner in the community. Other participants actively want to join your squad. RCS stacks faster than you can track it. This is why the people getting in now have a structural advantage over everyone who waits. Squads don't reset between campaigns. The network you build in campaign 1 is still yours in campaign 10. Your reputation as a value driver compounds. Your earning potential grows with every pool you join. The best time to start was the first campaign. The second best time is now. Browse open pools → https://t.co/8Nd4FYx7Za Stay notified on every new pool → https://t.co/Rox4Ocx4i9 Join the community → https://t.co/s36DErYuA9